When
President Abdel Fattah el-Sisi opened a much-heralded extension to the Suez Canal in August, the official
Friday Prayer sermon that week hailed it as a “gift from God”. When Egyptian
voters elected a new Parliament in December, a preacher on state TV urged its
members to “obey those in authority, specifically the highest authority”, and
referred indirectly to Mr. Sisi as “God’s shadow on earth”.
In
the latest decree, the Ministry of Religious Endowments on Monday instructed
preachers that any call to protest on Jan. 25, the fifth anniversary of the
revolution that toppled President Hosni Mubarak, would lead to “sabotage,
murder and destruction”, and constituted a “full crime”.
To
some Western observers, Mr. Behery
seemed to be taking Mr. Sisi’s call for a revolution in Islam at Al Azhar last
January. In that address, Mr. Sisi urged Egypt’s clerical leaders to purge
Islam of the ideas he said were used by extremists to justify violence and had
made the religion “an enemy of the world”.
“Egypt
is the country of injustice”, Mr. Behery wrote in a Facebook post before he was
imprisoned.
Some
clerics appeared to take Mr. Sisi’s speech last year as an attack on the integrity of Al Azhar itself, said
Nathan J. Brown, a professor of political science and international affairs at
George Washington University who specializes in the Middle East.
“For
people within Al Azhar, there was something remarkable and distasteful about a
president and a general lecturing them about religion,” he said. “You saw some
pushback, in the form of a proxy struggle. Then there was the episode with
Islam Behery.”
In
public, Al Azhar has always been loudly supportive of Mr. Sisi. Weeks later, Sheikh Ali Gomaa, a senior Al Azhar
cleric, justified violence against Muslim Brotherhood supporters, whom he
described as “putrid people” and “riffraff”.
“The
angels are supporting you from heaven,” Sheikh Gomaa told police and military
leaders.
“I
don’t see him as a dictator,” said Ashraf
El-Sherif, a lecturer in political science at the American University in
Cairo, referring to Mr. Sisi. “He’s the representative of an alliance of
dictatorial state institutions.”
“It’s
just another way of exerting control,” Amira Abd el Sayed, 20, said recently
during her lunchtime break. “It’s important to control the discussion of
religion,” said Adam Mustafa, a law student. “The media has made this into an
issue, not the students.”
Sheikh
Tayeb was “not even a proper sheikh,” or religious
scholar, said Amira Mohamed, one of a group of students in hijab sipping
coffee on a lawn. “In reality, the fatwa came from the president. Everyone
knows that.”
“We
have the cure to the diseases that ISIS and other groups are spreading,” said
Dr. Ibrahim Negm of Dar al-Ifta, a state-funded body that issues fatwas, or
religious edicts.
“There
are no more outlets for discussion,”
said Ali Kandil, a schoolteacher in a wealthy Cairo suburb who was ousted from
his position as a prayer leader because he had spoken publicly against “tyrants”.
“If anyone talks, he is killed or arrested,” he said. “If he’s not arrested, he
flees the country.”
Pointing
to the “ruin and chaos” that political upheaval wrought in neighboring Arab
countries, the 3,100-word official sermon warned against any “destructive” public
protests in Egypt.
“To
avoid evil and please God,” it said, “a person shall obey the rulers.”